These days Xiaomi, this hyped-up China phone maker, held the first on the net sales with the new Xiaomi Mi3 Smartphone along with the smart MITV, and the two devices had sold outs in merely over 60 seconds or so.

Ahead Of The iWatch, Apple Has Given HealthKit A Workout

ReadWriteBody is an ongoing series where ReadWrite covers networked fitness and the quantified self.


When Apple first unveiled HealthKit, its software for weaving together fitness apps, wearables, and iPhones, there were more breathless exclamations than you'd find in your average SoulCycle workout.


I was quick to deflate the hype around HealthKit, pointing out that the skimpy specs and documentation Apple released this summer showed that it was geared around fairly specific medical tasks, like recording a body-temperature reading from your armpit—not the needs of fitness-app makers.


Since then, Apple executives have been busy taking meetings with fitness-focused developers, and the most recent beta release of iOS 8, the next version of its iPhone software, suggests that HealthKit could actually be a helpful workout buddy.


Crucially, Apple introduced new data types and functions in HealthKit for logging workouts earlier this month that didn't exist in its first release. HealthKit apps can now log workout type, duration, and calories burned.


Even medically-oriented apps can capture more meaningful data now. Samir Damani, a cardiologist and CEO of MD Revolution, a fitness-app maker, pointed out to me that the first version of HealthKit didn't capture data like a user's body-fat percentage, which clinical studies have shown is a better predictor of fitness than weight or body-mass index. In its latest update, HealthKit now includes body-fat statistics as a metric.


In this regard, Apple is playing catch-up with Google, whose Google Fit software tools launched with far more developed workout-related features, and a better structure for adding new data types based on Android.


The latest reports suggest that Apple will announce a wearable device, the so-called "iWatch," in September—earlier than previously expected. The only clue to its function in Apple's documentation is HealthKit's ability to record heart-rate data from a wrist-based device.


HealthKit also records sleep-quality information, distinguishing whether you're in bed or actually asleep—data that devices like the Jawbone Up, Fitbit, and Runtastic Orbit can collect.


The question, though, is what Apple will do with all this data, whether it comes off an iWatch or other wearables that interact with HealthKit.


"It's not in Apple's DNA to interpret data," says MD Revolution's Damani. That will be up to HealthKit-ready apps.


It's a healthy sign, though, that Apple is making such rapid progress in fleshing out HealthKit, and going beyond just vital signs that a nurse might collect in a doctor's office to the real signals of a healthy body that we produce when we work out.


Photo via Shutterstock






from ReadWrite http://ift.tt/1q83Nco

via

Twitter Unveils A New Time-Waster: Tracking Your Popularity

Dropbox Antes Up In The Cloud-Storage Price War

The Truth About DevOps: "IT Isn't Dead; It's Not Even Dying"

Why We Self-Censor On Social Media

Comcast Data Caps Aren't Data Caps, Says Comcast

Comcast, already less than loved, once again has some explaining to do.


For years, the company has made sure policy makers and journalists know that it doesn’t apply “data caps.” Despite that, in some cities, Comcast imposes data limits on customers and, if they surpass that amount, issues them fines.


This is what is generally known as a data cap virtually everywhere else, but Comcast has even submitted an article correction emphasizing that while it may have "data thresholds" or "flexible data consumption plans,” it is allergic to calling them data caps.


Why does it matter what Comcast calls its scheme? Aside from being infuriating, it's also deceptive. By not calling its own practices by the name they are commonly known as, it could slow down or deter regulatory investigations.


This week, Comcast submitted a filing on its proposed Time Warner acquisition to New York Public Services Commission, indicating that “Comcast does not have ‘data caps’ today” and that even if it did, the federal government ought to be the governing body to investigate it, not New York, so the PSC shouldn’t even bother examining the claim.


It’s just the latest in a series of fishy moves by Comcast. Ars Technica has the whole story.






from ReadWrite http://ift.tt/1lwifv9

via

Soon Students Will Be Able To Control Satellites In Space

Uber Is Waging A Vicious, Spy-Tech Ground War Against Lyft

Why We Need Messaging Apps

Amazon's Cloud Is So Pervasive, Even Apple Uses It

Clinkle's Awful Hackathon Video Is A Diversity Report In Disguise

Will Amazon Turn Twitch Into Another GoodReads Failure?

Smartphone "Kill Switch" Law Now Mandatory In California

Lawmakers all over America have been pushing for the antitheft benefits of a smartphone “kill switch,” but California became the first state to require it by default on Monday.


Governor Jerry Brown signed what’s been colloquially known as the “kill switch” bill after it passed in the state legislature this August. Introduced in February by state Sen. Mark Leno, D-San Francisco, the bill makes it mandatory for all smartphones to come with a default way to lock down the phone if it is stolen, making it unusable.


Minnesota was the first state to sign a “kill switch” bill into law this May, but the difference is that earlier bill made the kill switch an opt-in option, not a default setting. Leno stressed that the California version of the bill, if passed, would need to be more stringent.


"Opt-in does not end the problem. Because it will not be ubiquitous," he told the Senate in April.



See also: How A Smartphone Kill Switch Could Save Consumers A Ton Of Money



Policymakers and consumers alike have clamored for the “kill switch” standard, claiming that if stolen smartphones are instantly bricked, the incentive to steal them will plummet significantly.


William Duckworth, an associate professor of data science and analytics at Creighton University, found that a kill switch could save American consumers millions, if not billions of dollars. Not only do consumers spend $580 million yearly replacing their stolen phones, but if theft was no longer an issue, they could buy cheaper insurance plans.


Carriers are also rooting for the plan in their own way; CTIA, the largest U.S. trade organization that supports the cellular operators, made their own “kill switch” proposal in April. However, the proposal has been criticized for doing far more to cover the industry’s bases than to help people.



See also: The Kill Switch Proposal: Why U.S. Carriers Win Either Way



Overall, the general consensus is that kill switches will only act as a deterrent if they’re turned on by default; otherwise there’s no guarantee consumers will remember to turn them on. Now California, with its pioneering default kill switch, will put that theory to the test.


Photo of State Sen. Mark Leno by Kelly Huston






from ReadWrite http://ift.tt/1qoLMGG

via

Belatedly, TiVo Makes Its Play For Cord-Cutters

Latest Rumor: Twitch Will Sell To Amazon, Not Google

LG Cuts Corners: Its Round Smartwatch Is Due Next Week

Ralph Lauren Aims To Make Fitness Tech Fabulous

Is The Age Of Software Over? Not Even Close

The Most Hilarious Tech Confessions On The Web

New Lingerie Collection Showcases Some Real Women Of Tech

Here's A Phone-Charging Bracelet You Might Actually Wear

Instagram Launches Advertising Analytics

Secret Is Cracking Down On Bullying

White House Cybersecurity Czar Is Total N00b (And Proud Of It)

Only in Washington, DC could a lack of technological know-how be a positive thing. In a city where people prefer to vote for charismatic politicians over intellectuals, White House cybersecurity coordinator Michael Daniel sees his lack of expertise as a selling point.


"Being too down in the weeds at the technical level could actually be a little bit of a distraction," he told Gov Info Security. "You can get enamored with the very detailed aspects of some of the technical solutions. And, particularly here at the White House ... the real issue is to look at the broad, strategic picture and the impact that technology will have."


Daniel, who describes himself as “not a coder” is an unlikely appointed official to oversee the White House’s national cybersecurity strategy and policy. Most senior policy makers, as Vox observes, have advanced degrees in the fields they operate in. The surgeon general is a medical doctor, the attorney general has a law degree, and the head of the federal reserve has a degree in economics. And honestly, would we trust them as much if they didn’t?


In his own words, Daniel has a degree in public policy, but says he has little experience in programming or protecting computer networks from attacks. We can trust him to make policy, but probably not as the one in charge during a national cybersecurity emergency.


The situation echoes that of Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) coordinator Michael D. Brown. It wasn’t until Hurricane Katrina that it came out that Brown had inadequate experience in disaster management and was forced to resign after his botched handling of the situation.


It would take a cybersecurity equivalent of Hurricane Katrina to put Daniel’s skills to the test, but let’s hope it doesn’t come to that.


Photo of Michael Daniel courtesy of CSIS






from ReadWrite http://ift.tt/1qxcrgU

via

Why The JavaScript World Is Still Waiting For Node.js 1.0

Here's Why Your iMessage Spam Runneth Over

Why Flipboard Has Authors Flipping Out

Facebook Still Thinks It Can Make Apps Work More Like The Web

What The Tweet? Your Illustrated Guide To New Twitter Jargon

Baby, You Can Crash My Simulated Car

Why FitStar Decided Its Workout Algorithm Needed To Shape Up

Guess Who’s Bringing Gigabit Broadband To Google’s Backyard?

Want A Job In Tech? Become A Linux Expert

Twitter Tightens Photo Policies Following High-Profile Deaths

Want To Start An Open Source Project? Here's How

Get Ready To Say Goodbye To The Traffic Light

Time Out: Twitter Is Officially Mucking With Your Timeline

Why YouTube Music Key Is A Streaming Service That Might Actually Work

Now You, Too, Can Obsess Over Your Dropbox File Permissions

PayPal Wants You To Never Pull Out Your Credit Card Again

With Mailbox For Desktop, We May All Live At The Post Office Again

Why More Robot Workers Isn't A Bad Thing For Jobs

Robot usage in the global manufacturing industry has been climbing steadily since 2009, the MIT Technology Review reports.


Sourcing World Robotics, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, and the OECD, MIT found that robotic worker purchases increase every year. However, a closer look at the numbers indicates that robots aren’t taking jobs directly from human counterparts.


In Europe (except Germany), the numbers show that robot usage is up and human employment is down. In America, Germany, and South Korea, however, robot usage and human employment are up. It’s less an indication that robots are replacing people than evidence that German, American, and Korean cars are in demand. After all, the MIT research indicates that the automotive industry has embraced robots more so than any other industrial sector.


It’s hard to tell, but here’s a theory: when the economy is bad and sales are down, increased efficiency from robots keeps struggling auto industries afloat. When the economy is good and sales are up, robots and people both increase in number to meet demand. Robots require maintenance and oversight from humans, so if anything, more robots ought to mean more people when the economy demands it.



See also: Jibo's Cynthia Breazeal: Why We Will Learn To Love Our Robots



Cynthia Breazeal, a former MIT Media Lab researcher who has gone on to create personal robot assistant Jibo, says the idea of robots stealing human jobs is an outdated one.


“There’s a knee-jerk reaction from the past about robots trying to replace people and take away jobs. But in reality that’s not quite what happens,” she said. “With any new technology, they take over the jobs that people don’t necessarily want to do anyway, and they create new jobs. They empower people to do more interesting work.”


Breazeal cited Race Against the Machine , an academic book about the way robots are transforming human employment. Instead of looking at robots as soulless usurpers, we should see them as tools designed by humans to help humans live—and work—better.


“I think we need to do a better job communicating this new, more enlightened philosophy: robots are supplementing what people do. They’re meant to help support us and allow us to do the kind of work that humans in particular find much more interesting and much more fulfilling because humans are creative, humans do things that machines don’t. It’s really about teamwork.”






from ReadWrite http://ift.tt/1o9xEvV

via

Roku TV Disrupts Nothing, Which May Make It The Smartest Smart TV Yet

Hey, Wait A Minute—The Moto 360 Has Wi-Fi?

A Replacement For Windows 8 May Be Nearing The "Threshold"

Thanks, Best Buy! Now We Know The Moto 360's Specs And Price—$250

Has Silicon Valley Reached Peak Hoodie?

Meet the First Woman to Ever Win Math's Most Prestigious Award

How And Why Google Is Open Sourcing Its Data Centers

Apple's Executive Page Just Got More Diverse

In Exposing Followers, Medium Fails Readers

Vacationers, Let Your Smart Home House-Sit Itself

Samsung Buys Smart-Home Outfit SmartThings, Reportedly For $200 Million

Google's Got An Open Source Android Problem

GitHub May Actually Be Dragging Government Into The 21st Century

Where And How To Code: Choosing The Best Free Code Editor

Robin Williams' Death Brings Communal, Complicated Grief To Internet

Galaxy Alpha Won’t Stop Samsung's Bleed

Square Beware! Amazon Goes In For The Kill

Big Data's Poster Child Has Issues—But They're Not Slowing Hadoop Down

Why No One's Going To Win The Messaging War

Is Reddit Dropping The Ban Hammer On BuzzFeed?

Meet The Python Programmers Who Taught A Fish To Play Pokémon

LinkedIn Wants You To Contemplate Your Future Careers—All Of Them

Tim Cook Takes A Diverse Stance: Apple's Gay And Disabled Employees Matter Too

Yo's Update Suggests It Might Be More Than A One-Word Joke

How To Code Like A Startup

How Not To Use LinkedIn

The White House Now Has A Digital SWAT Team

When U.S. government sites don't work the way they should, they aren't just unhelpful—they also make the federal government look like it's stuck in the 20th century.


On Monday, the White House announced a new organization designed to help spruce up government websites and (it hopes) prevent another HealthCare.gov debacle. Called the U.S. Digital Service, it will be tasked with modernizing the government's digital presence and revamping how the feds provide information and online services in ways that compare favorably with Amazon or Facebook.


The White House has hired Mikey Dickerson, the former Google engineer largely credited with resolving the HealthCare.gov catastrophe, to head USDS. The small organization will serve as consultants for other federal agencies, aiming to help them improve everything from user interfaces to database integration.


The plan is mostly just to make everything work better, although the group would also be happy to prevent technological disasters before they occur. As federal CIO Steve VanRoekel has described it (as related by the Washington Post):



So the goal is to amplify the team's influence by setting standards, introducing a culture of technological accountability, and figuring out "common technology patterns" that can be replicated across agencies, like single-sign-on for federal Web sites. "Build once, use often," VanRoekel calls it.



In tandem with the launch, USDS is releasing a Digital Services Playbook that outlines basic best practices for government agency web maintenance including “use a modern technology stack” and “default to open [source].”


If the USDS is looking for someplace to start, here's one suggestion:



See also: FCC's Net-Neutrality Web Crash Gives You An Opportunity To Learn What John Oliver Got Wrong



Official White House photo by Pete Souza






from ReadWrite http://ift.tt/1ukmmNf

via

Watch as One World Trade Center Comes to Life in a Stunning Time Lapse

Jibo's Cynthia Breazeal: Making Robots Part Of Our Lives

8 Questions You Should Ask a Key Employee Before They Quit

The Westboro Baptist Church's Silicon Valley Protest: An Illustrated Guide

Parents, Please Step Away From The High-Tech Baby Monitor

Facebook Puts An End To Apps That Beg For Likes

What Twitter Can Learn From Pinterest Conversations

Hey, Android Developers—Why Should iOS Coders Have All The Fun?

Machine Learning Goes Open Source

How Wearables Become Buyables

Researchers Discover “Superdialects” Through Twitter Study

How To Use Heroku's GitHub Preview Button

YouTube Superstars Bring In The Fans, But Not The Money—Yet

"Web Developer" Is A Job Title That Has Come And Gone

Wikimedia To Europe: Don't Let Us Be Forgotten

The New Rule Of Social: Let's Not Be Friends

Foursquare's New Flagship App Is Totally Over The Check-In

It Really Is About Time For Apple To Start Tweeting

Flipboard Users Have Created More Than 10 Million Magazines

You Can Now Work As A "GIF Content Specialist"

Fruity Pebbles And The New Crop Of Stylish Wearables

Heads Up! This Startup Thinks It Can Solve The Distracted Driving Problem

How All The Major U.S. Carriers Throttle Your Mobile Data

Apple's Abrupt Mac OS X Change Could Block Many Apps

Apple told developers Monday afternoon that many of their older Mac applications will not run in the next update to Mac OS X unless they "re-sign" them using a digital-signature tool in OS X 10.9 Mavericks, the current version of the Mac operating system. Many developers aren't happy about the abrupt change:


The change affects all Mac applications built on older versions of Mac OS X—specifically, any version that predates Mavericks, which officially launched last October. As of the next release of the desktop operating system—that'll be OS X 10.9.5—those apps may simply no longer function until their digital signatures are updated using a tool in Mavericks. (These apps also won't function in future versions of OS X, including the beta version of OS X 10.10 Yosemite.)


Apple offered no immediate explanation for the new requirement. A large number of common apps could be affected by the change; see below for details.


Sign Me Up


Apple requires developers to digitally "sign" their applications, ostensibly for security reasons. Signing an app vouchsafes it as the creation of a given developer, and lets the Mac operating system detect any changes to its underlying code. (Apple explains the process in more detail in its official code-signing guide.)


Pre-Mavericks versions of OS X used an older code-signing technology that produced what Apple calls "version 1" signatures. OS X 10.9.5 and future OS X versions will require "version 2" signatures, which require the use of the "codesign" tool within Mavericks.


It's not clear how much time developers have to re-sign their older applications. Apple hasn't said when Mavericks 10.9.5 will launch; it just released the first 10.9.5 beta last Wednesday.


Caught In The Digital Dragnet


If developers don't act quickly, large numbers of common apps could be affected. Developer John Bafford published a command-line script on GitHub Gist that identifies the signature version of all programs in a Mac's applications folder. It looks like this, in case you're curious:


I ran the command on my Mac and found almost 50 applications with version 1 signatures, including Apple's iMovie, iPhoto, iTunes, Numbers, Pages and Keynote. Other affected programs include Microsoft Office 2011, Adobe Reader, Dropbox, Google Chrome, Firefox and Evernote. (Oh, and Minecraft, too.)


I don't have many apps from smaller developer teams on my machine, but I wouldn't be surprised to find lots of them with version 1 signatures. What's more, big companies have the resources to re-sign and update their apps well in advance of the release of OS X 10.9.5; smaller developers may be much harder pressed to do that in time.


I pinged Apple PR for further explanation of the announcement, and will update if I hear back.


Lead image by Flickr user ishmael daro, CC 2.0






from ReadWrite http://ift.tt/1soxQfM

via

Why The Internet Of Things Is Still Roadblocked

12 Tips for Creating Your Startup's Board of Advisors

The Reddit "Cat Facts" Prank Is Now An Amazingly Annoying App