These days Xiaomi, this hyped-up China phone maker, held the first on the net sales with the new Xiaomi Mi3 Smartphone along with the smart MITV, and the two devices had sold outs in merely over 60 seconds or so.

Comcast, Blasted By Customers, Disappoints Developers Too

Wednesday, at the Code Conference in Los Angeles, Comcast CEO Brian Roberts told an audience of technology executives, analysts and journalists that he’s “trying to change the company.” He has a team comprising more than a thousand software engineers, he said, suggesting the cable provider wants to become a major player in the software development game.


It’s an ambitious goal, even if it does seem a little unlikely. For all of the company’s vast coffers, there’s still one thing it doesn’t have: APIs released to the developer community. There’s no way for outside app makers to work with Comcast’s latest X1 television platform.


Picking up on this, an audience member asked Roberts when that will change. The chief executive offered no date or estimated timeline. Instead, he said, “[It’s] on the road map.”


Vague much?


Developing Frustration


X1 is Comcast’s attempt to beat back the cord-cutting movement. A HTML5-based Internet television platform, it offers a “set-top-box-in-the-cloud” premise—blending live television with streaming and apps—making for Comcast's most innovative, technologically relevant product yet.


As a product offering, it has had limited test runs up until now, but Comcast hopes to officially roll it out this year. The potential reach could be enormous. According to the New York Times, Comcast currently services 21.7 million total video subscribers.


That raises the stakes for potential developers, especially if this “road map” actually leads somewhere. It's a hazy, amorphous promise. Until the company offers some clarity, only one thing is really crystal clear: Comcast isn't offering outside developers any APIs, or application programming interfaces, to make apps for this X1 platform. Some day, sure. But not now.


It’s baffling, given Roberts’ declaration—especial when you consider that X1 is an emerging platform about to launch in an app-driven world created by the likes of Apple and Google. X1 only has a few applications from outside companies, primarily Facebook and Pandora. Comcast is reportedly pursuing a deal with game company Electronic Arts, but even if it succeeds, those would be streaming games, not apps. As it stands, there’s no Netflix, Hulu, or YouTube, much less apps from smaller developers like Plex. There’s not even an app for Angry Birds, Flappy Birds or any other type of birds.


Of course, Comcast owns the platform, so it can do whatever it wants. But there's something a bit arrogant about a company that believes it can innovate better on its own (or by cherry-picking partners) than the broader community.


If the company really does want to become something other than the dictator of cable TV and Internet broadband pipes that people think it is—if it wants to step out as a technological innovator—then it needs to do something different. It needs to embrace the developer community.


Comcast should have its APIs ready for launch. At the least, it should plan to ramp up for a quick release shortly after X1 rolls out, sending developers invitations to sign up. Comcast shouldn't keep developers on the back burner, waiting around until the company gets around to it. Some day. Eventually.


“We Don’t Wake Up Wanting To Be Hated”



Meanwhile, when it comes to the public at large, the cable company sits in the hot seat. ”We don't wake up every day, and go to work and say, 'We want to be hated,'" Roberts said in response to a question from an audience member. The topic was Comcast and Time Warner Cable—the object of its acquisition dreamsranking near the bottom for customer satisfaction.


Glenn Derene, electronics editor at Consumer Reports, believes he knows why: “Everything else in consumer technology is getting more affordable every year—everything except communications services.”


But Roberts clearly doesn't think that's the full story. At the Code Conference, he cited his reasoning for the Comcast hate: It's a consumer-facing company, he said, so it takes the flack when others raise their prices. (The “others” here likely refers to TV studios and networks, and their expensive rights or programming agreements.)


It’s an excuse that’s about as satisfying as “it’s on the road map.” And if it were true, all cable and satellite providers would be in a heated race to the bottom, not just those two.


This issue and the attitude toward developers are fundamentally connected. Comcast has an opportunity to pursue a robust ecosystem, one that welcomes developers and excites customers. Allowing third-party developers to bring their apps and services to X1 would provide more services, features and entertainment to end users. And it could do it without those expensive content deals. Too bad the company appears to be squandering this opportunity to turn sentiment around.


Roberts said he wants to change the company. And he has a pathway to do so. Unfortunately, with arrogance and excuses, it just looks like more of the same.


Comcast was contacted for this article, but as of this writing, had not replied to inquiries.


Image by Owen Thomas for ReadWrite






from ReadWrite http://ift.tt/1koL594

via

Microsoft Is Also Reportedly Piling Into The Smartwatch Race




When Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella said his company would forget past blunders—like missing the boat on smartphones—and focus on the future, he wasn’t kidding. The Surface maker is planning on entering the rapidly growing smartwatch market with its very own wristworn contender, Forbes reports.



According to sources “with knowledge of the company’s plans,” the device will be festooned with sensors and will incorporate technology and expertise from Microsoft’s Kinect motion-detecting controller, specifically in optical engineering, to continuously track heart rate. The gadget will supposedly feature a color display oriented on the underside of the wrist, presumably for privacy protection, with an overall appearance similar to Samsung’s Gear Fit.


Unlike Samsung's device, however, Microsoft’s version will work with Androids, iPhones and Windows Phones when it debuts, possibly this summer.


Image collage by Adriana Lee for ReadWrite






from ReadWrite http://ift.tt/1ozjUQp

via

Samsung Reportedly Has A New Smartwatch Communicator Up Its Sleeve


Samsung's Gear 2 Samsung's Gear 2



Samsung has decided to augment its recently announced lineup of wearables—the Gear 2, Gear 2 Neo, and Gear Fit—with another new smartwatch due out this summer, the Wall Street Journal reported Friday.


Unlike the previous models, the South Korean tech maker is reportedly working on a standalone smartwatch that can make calls, send messages, track heartrate and take photos without being paired to a smartphone. Details on Samsung's unnamed device could be announced as soon as next week, during a press event Wednesday about giving health a voice.


The company has also been rumored to be working on a virtual reality gaming headset for use with its Galaxy phones and tablets. If true, Samsung’s “pray and spray” approach to mobiles has clearly expanded, with an ambitious, overarching bid to rule people’s heads, wrists and pockets.






from ReadWrite http://ift.tt/1gXdDfi

via

Apple And Google Agree To Stop Suing Each Other Over Smartphone Patents




The tangle of patent litigation between two of the world’s top tech companies appears to have just straightened out: Apple and Google's Motorola Mobility have agreed to stop suing each other over smartphone technology and “work together in some areas of patent reform,” Reuters reported Friday.


It’s not clear what that means precisely, other than putting a kibosh on all existing lawsuits between the two. That would come to roughly 20 cases in the United States and Germany coming to an end, said a Gigaom source “familiar with the litigation.” Patent lawsuits between Apple and Samsung don’t appear to be affected or influenced by the agreement.


Image by Flickr user Brian Turner



from ReadWrite http://ift.tt/RJlfpD

via

Silicon Valley Episode 6 Recap: "Third Party Insourcing"

HBO's Silicon Valley returned this week with its sixth episode, continuing to peel back the layers of California’s tech bubble and proving everything in the valley isn’t as shiny as it may seem. “Third Party Insourcing” shows us that newer and younger may not always be better—Richard (Thomas Middleditch) and the Pied Piper team enable the help of a surly teen hacker and Jared is taken hostage by a driverless car.


The episode opens up with Richard back in his doctor’s office, telling his physician that while he had learned programming language Ruby On Rails over a weekend as a teenager, the Pied Piper lead was just unable to handle programming his product for the cloud. His doctor mentions that Richard looks as if he’s aged 40 years in the past seven weeks—the amount of time since preparing for his app’s debut at startup competition TechCrunch Disrupt.



Jared, Erlich, and Dinesh beg Richard to employ help in front of their packed Scrum board. Jared, Erlich, and Dinesh beg Richard to employ help in front of their packed Scrum board.



With one week left until Disrupt, the team is clearly antsy to get Pied Piper up and polished. Back at the incubator, Jared (Zach Woods), Erlich (T.J. Miller), and Dinesh (Kumail Nanjiani) beg Richard to hire a hacker to help with cloud architecture, using their packed Scrum board as evidence that they needed to get as many jobs from “Ice Box” to “Completed” as soon as possible. The team suggests “The Carver” (Austin Abrams), a hacker notorious for taking down Bank of America.



A chair angrily plunged into a "Making The World A Better Place" poster. A chair angrily plunged into a "Making The World A Better Place" poster.



The Pied Piper team head to a building to enlist the help of “The Carver.” Upon arrival, the crew sees what used to be a startup’s headquarters being broken down—computer monitors being carried into boxes, desks being unassembled. It is a glaring example to the team of the frailty and turnover cycle of fresh startups.



Signs of a failed startup—empty coffee cups and energy drinks just strewn across the room. Signs of a failed startup—empty coffee cups and energy drinks just strewn across the room.



Richard, Jared, Erlich, and Dinesh walk through the floors, wide-eyed and somber like civilians witnessing the aftermath of the apocalypse. There’s a chair puncturing the wall, right over a poster exclaiming “Making The World A Better Place”. Conference rooms are littered with empty coffee cups and energy drinks.



Kevin "The Carver" judging the Pied Piper team relentlessly. Kevin "The Carver" judging the Pied Piper team relentlessly.



“6 months ago, these guys had 35 million in Series B financing. Now, The Carver’s here doing teardown,” Jared remarks.


The team sees The Carver turned around and huddled over three large monitors, pushing out code. When the prominent hacker faces the group, we and the Pied Piper team learn that he is Kevin, a bratty high schooler who immediately jumps into sarcastic quips about Richard’s age.


“I thought you’d be younger,” Kevin says, “What are you, 25?”


“26,” Richard replies.


“Yikes.”


Silicon Valley’s youthful tech bubble is not a new concept, with attractive 20 to 30-year-olds ruling the roost at startups and beyond. This episode plays on the very real trend of children being indoctrinated into code, and tech companies’ search for nubile programming talent.


Kevin’s age is apparent despite his experience in engineering, as Erlich uses a blowjob joke to negotiate a deal—$20,000 for two days aiding the Pied Piper team.



The men of Pied Piper: Richard in a button up and hoodie, Dinesh in a striped polo, Erlich in a red Atari t-shirt, and Jared in a button up underneath a sweater. The men of Pied Piper: Richard in a button up and hoodie, Dinesh in a striped polo, Erlich in a red Atari t-shirt, and Jared in a button up underneath a sweater.



By this sixth episode, we see the characters solidify their distinct style of dress for their roles. Richard continues his channeling of Zuckerberg in button-ups, hoodies, and corduroys. Dinesh wears a striped green and purple hoodie, while Jared sticks to his blazers and button-ups under sweaters.



Erlich in his CSS3 shirt. Erlich in his CSS3 shirt.



Erlich wears a bright red Atari shirt with a full beard for a portion of the episode, only to change into a CSS3 shirt for the remainder, capturing geek chic with his novelty t-shirts.



Kevin tries to help the Pied Piper team with their cloud architecture. He wears a colorfully striped hoodie, an open button up, and a t-shirt. Kevin tries to help the Pied Piper team with their cloud architecture. He wears a colorfully striped hoodie, an open button up, and a t-shirt.



In juxtaposition, Kevin’s colorfully striped hoodies over open button ups and t-shirts evokes a more childlike aura. “The Carver” is already eliciting markers of the “programmer” look but with a teenage twist in bright colors and graphics. He is much like a mini version Richard, truly a kid coder.



Jared wears a dark grey blazer, light grey sweater, and a button up. Monica wears a dark turquoise sweater, grey skirt, and a simple gold necklace. Jared wears a dark grey blazer, light grey sweater, and a button up. Monica wears a dark turquoise sweater, grey skirt, and a simple gold necklace.



Monica (Amanda Crew) returns briefly this episode to meet with Jared and offer him a ride back to Erlich’s home in Palo Alto. She is dressed in a dark turquoise sweater, light grey pencil skirt, and delicate gold accessories, once again demonstrating her power and business savvy as Peter Gregory’s assistant through her stylish and put-together outfits.



Monica helping out one of Peter Gregory's assistants while on the phone with Jared. Monica helping out one of Peter Gregory's assistants while on the phone with Jared.



This episode fails the Bechdel test yet again, as no women are not seen talking to each other at all. Gilfoyle’s girlfriend Tara (Milana Vayntrub) interacts solely with the men at the Pied Piper house, and another nameless woman from Peter Gregory’s company is introduced by Monica as an assistant who made a mistake. Monica and the assistant never talk, mind you, as she is explaining the woman’s mistake to Jared on the phone.



Jared happily embarks on his journey in a driverless car. Jared happily embarks on his journey in a driverless car.



When Jared suggests going back by Lyft, Monica insists that one of Peter Gregory’s cars take him back. Jared agrees, and is met by a black driverless car. Excited and chuckling, the new Pied Piper member is shuttled off to Palo Alto.



The driverless car makes an unexpected change in route to Peter Gregory's island, Arallon. The driverless car makes an unexpected change in route to Peter Gregory's island, Arallon.



Unfortunately, the fun ride comes abruptly to a stop as the car arbitrary changes direction to Arallon—Peter Gregory’s high-tech island hidden far in the middle of an ocean—4,000 miles away. Unable to reroute the driverless car after multiple sad pleas, Jared is taken to a port and driven into a crate which is then immediately locked up.



Jared is taken hostage by the driverless car, which takes him into a crate and eventually onto a ship. Jared is taken hostage by the driverless car, which takes him into a crate and eventually onto a ship.



The crate is picked up and delivered onto a giant cargo ship—Jared, in a car, in a crate, on a ship, is being sailed away to Peter Gregory’s island.


Richard begins working with Kevin on Pied Piper’s cloud architecture. Dealing with Kevin’s difficult attitude, Richard continues to reveal vulnerability and asks the hacker to help him with the app’s data replication. After heading to the store and returning with snacks, Richard finds Kevin under the table, sobbing and terrified, and learns that Kevin had mistakenly overwritten the data scheme.



Kevin admits that he never took down Bank of America on purpose, but rather made a coding mistake while working there as a consultant. Kevin admits that he never took down Bank of America on purpose, but rather made a coding mistake while working there as a consultant.



“The Carver” explains that the same thing had happened at Bank of America, that he was actually not hacking them but working as a consultant and had made a colossal coding mistake. The bank had only agreed not to sue him if he agreed not to tell a soul he had worked there.


With one week left to Disrupt, and the team flies into a panic trying to fix Kevin’s mistake.


“Richard, why would you let that little fetus access the DDM?” Gilfoyle snarls. Richard responds, “Because I thought that fetus was better than me, and so did you.”


Caught up in Silicon Valley’s youth-obsessed culture, the Pied Piper team immediately thought that because the young hacker had rumors of greatness trailing him, that Kevin had to be a programming prodigy. What they learned was not only that was not true, but “The Carver” had a tendency to create massive mistakes in his inexperience.


Richard and Kevin decide to work through the night and examine every line of code to find where the mistake lay. Finally, the two are able to remedy the problem and Pied Piper is back on track to launch. In a final testament to tech’s youth culture—the immaturity mixed with power, money, and knowledge, Kevin says, “I’m going to call my mom and have her pick me up.”


“Mom?” Richard laughs.


“By the way, you owe me 20,000 dollars,” Kevin bluntly delivers.



Jared realizes that the fork lift he was flagging down is driverless. Jared realizes that the fork lift he was flagging down is driverless.



Jared finally reaches Arallon by the end of the episode, popping out of the driverless car and crate looking disheveled and with days of unshaven facial hair. He immediately sees a forklift engulfed in boxes heading his way. Elated and desperate, Jared shouts and flags the forklift down, only to find it is (surprise!) a driverless machine.



Jared amongst the driverless machines at Peter Gregory's island. Jared amongst the driverless machines at Peter Gregory's island.



The final moments of the episode show a beautifully composed and thematically rich shot of Jared facing a gigantic warehouse full of self-moving machines, not a human being in sight.


Jared realizes he is alone on Peter Gregory’s island, one man amidst a thousand active machines. As these instruments meticulously build the island with unparalleled skill and intelligence, even Jared cannot connect with them on a sentient and compassionate level in order to get help.






from ReadWrite http://ift.tt/1oqR3xx

via

Net Neutrality: FCC To Revise Proposal Against Internet "Fast Lane"

Public outcry over the Federal Communications Commission’s proposal to regulate net neutrality that could possibly make Internet content providers like Netflix or Google to pay broadband providers for faster connectivity has forced federal regulators to reconsider its proposed policy, The Wall Street Journal reported over the weekend.


The FCC is attempting to enact policy regulation for net neutrality, a concept that would it prohibit Internet providers like the cable or cellular companies from filtering, slowing or otherwise limiting the data traffic that flows over their networks. The backlash against the FCC came when its recent proposal allowed for "paid prioritization" which would allow broadband providers to charge more for companies to deliver their services (like movies on Netflix) to consumers. In essence, companies would have to pay to be in the "fast lane" of Internet service.


Craig Aaron, president and CEO of non-profit advocacy group Free Press, said that FCC chairman Tom Wheeler is feeling the pressure to enact meaningful and sustainable policy to regulate net neutrality.


"[The FCC is] asking better questions. But they can't do what they claim they want to do with their preferred legal approach. It won't work,” Aaron said in an email to ReadWrite.


If the FCC leans on its full legal authority, a provision known as Title II of the Communications Act, it could treat Internet access as a public utility which would allow it to have more regulatory freedom over net neutrality. In January, a court denied the FCC's ability to regulate net neutrality based on how Internet providers are currently classified by law.


"The FCC needs to adopt clear rules prohibiting blocking and discrimination online,” Chris Riley, senior policy engineer at Mozilla, said in a recent blog post.


Proposal’s by Mozilla and others will be heard this week by the FCC when it meets to vote on the plan, but it is not clear in any way if regulators will actually be swayed by such arguments.


Lead image courtesy of Shutterstock.






from ReadWrite http://ift.tt/1minwUc

via

Pebble’s Eric Migicovsky: The Full Interview At ReadWriteMix

In April, Pebble CEO and founder Eric Migicovsky stopped by our headquarters for an on-stage interview at ReadWriteMix, ReadWrite’s question-and-answer event series. The event was a big success, with a packed room.


We asked attendees to reserve their seat with an optional donation to Girls Who Code, an organization that shares ReadWrite's values about democratizing access to technology. We raised $451 for the organization, and based on that success, we're going to ask attendees at future ReadWriteMix events to make a donation in support of Girls Who Code.



We gave a quick recap of the event, but we now have the complete video to share, as well as highlights of the conversation. (A note: We had to rely on a backup source of audio due to an equipment failure, so the sound quality is not ideal. Our apologies for that—but Migicovsky is worth a close listen.)


Here’s the complete video of our half-hour talk and questions from the audience:



Migicovsky defines the modern smart watch as “a wearable computer that connects to the Internet … and brings you information ambiently to your wrist.”



How crowdfunding website Kickstarter figured into Pebble’s success:



Why smartwatches need to meet people on their own terms and “mesh into your life”:



Migicovsky on how he’s building an operating system for wearables:



How the failure of Migicovsky’s first smartwatch, the Allerta InPulse, taught the company a hard lesson:



Migicovsky gives back to the Kickstarter community by backing cool campaigns himself:



”The idea of competitors in this space is not new.”



Migicovsky on how context shapes your smart watch:



Our next ReadWriteMix is June 3, with Foursquare CEO Dennis Crowley. We'll be making tickets available soon.






from ReadWrite http://ift.tt/R7NMoV

via